The US recently just released a report griping about “human rights violations” in my home country, where they execute drug traffickers in quasi military operations. I don’t think we do it because of some US conspiracy. Rather, drug use and what it gives rise to is deeply offensive in more collective societies. And frankly, was in the west too until it jumped the shark.
You’re just saying it’s not possible to have an orderly society and enforce the law, which I don’t believe. If you compare say San Francisco to Singapore, it’s hard not to conclude that permissiveness increases disorder while enforcement decreases it.
If people in a society vote to deal with this issue, and their solution is to execute people in the drug-trade, why is that bad? Why is Rayiner's legitimate opinion being considered illegitimate by you?