Re:More than 19,000 undersea volcanoes discovered
by iancmceachern on Saturday April 22, 2023 @02:41AM
(#35663984)
The light transmission through the water, it's cloudiness, is just way to variable for something like this to work constantly, reliably.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:More than 19,000 undersea volcanoes discovered
by throwaway8503 on Saturday April 22, 2023 @02:44AM
(#35663992)
Wouldn't the cloudiness itself be a signal?
Presumably it's essentially clear of suspended particles, most of the time.
Re:More than 19,000 undersea volcanoes discovered
by iancmceachern on Saturday April 22, 2023 @03:00AM
(#35664059)
The issue is that the cloudiness of water, even open water, varies greatly. So there would be either lots and lots of false positives, or the system would be too insensitive.
Think driving in fog
Re:More than 19,000 undersea volcanoes discovered
by iancmceachern on Saturday April 22, 2023 @02:48AM
(#35664013)
A signal of what?
Re:More than 19,000 undersea volcanoes discovered
by throwaway8503 on Saturday April 22, 2023 @02:57AM
(#35664050)
Something solid ahead
To clarify: I mean that, generally speaking, the presence of 'cloudy' water would presumably signify that the seafloor was close. In the open ocean, maybe a sea mount is surrounded by essentially a cloud of particles.
Edit: I think your reply made the thread reach maximum depth, so I'll end it here.. I should do more reading on the topic.
Re:More than 19,000 undersea volcanoes discovered
by iancmceachern on Saturday April 22, 2023 @03:18AM
(#35664144)
The problem I'm highlighting is it also gets cloudy randomly in open ocean, for lots of other reasons.