News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Windows on Btrfs by whitemary on Saturday April 22, 2023 @01:04AM (#35663495)
The Linux audience is software engineers and the companies they who employ them.
Re:Windows on Btrfs by cpach on Saturday April 22, 2023 @04:24AM (#35664446)
So why haven’t such an open source application materialized after all these years?
Re:Windows on Btrfs by voltagex_ on Saturday April 22, 2023 @05:25AM (#35664754)
Well you'd need to fund the cost of a kernel driver signing certificate and get it through WHQL as well. That's just for a start. So this wouldn't be something you could build yourself.
Re:Windows on Btrfs by circuit10 on Saturday April 22, 2023 @07:46AM (#35665569)
Surely you’d just need to turn driver signing off
Re:Windows on Btrfs by KyeRussell on Saturday April 22, 2023 @04:30AM (#35664479)
Back when I was a desktop Linux user, a very sizeable portion of the other people I knew that used it weren’t “software engineers”. They were ‘power users’. I don’t think that my experience was all that atypical.
Re:Windows on Btrfs by csomar on Saturday April 22, 2023 @08:50AM (#35666119)
The need is more personal than corporate.
Re:Windows on Btrfs by smoldesu on Saturday April 22, 2023 @10:54AM (#35667157)
There are corporate solutions (like the Paragon drivers), they just suck. Paragon tried merging this code into the Linux kernel, but the code was so bad and unmaintainable that it was rejected. The FOSS solution is using FUSE, but that requires a UNIX-like OS for easy porting. Unless Windows ditches the NT kernel altogether, I don't think you can expect native filesystem extensions beyond NFS support.

GNU philosophy is not about moneymaking or footing the bill. Sometimes a problem gets worse when you throw money at it.