Windows on Btrfs

Re:Windows on Btrfs by hackmiester on Friday April 21, 2023 @08:37PM (#35662103)

> I think exfat has recently gained support in all three platforms but it's not reliable for an internal hard drive (I think?).

I've been doing this for a few years now. It just doesn't support some stuff, like permissions, but for just a pile of files, it's fine.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Windows on Btrfs by toastal on Friday April 21, 2023 @11:16PM (#35663047)

No symlinks, no transparent compression… there's quite a few mission things

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Windows on Btrfs by toastal on Saturday April 22, 2023 @07:33AM (#35665468)

Missing*

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Windows on Btrfs by hackmiester on Monday April 24, 2023 @09:09PM (#35695360)

I haven't stubbed my toe on the former yet, but I agree it's not great. I'm mainly storing media, photos, etc. (relatively not compressible) so the latter doesn't matter much to me. I think that's probably a common use case for a drive you can read anywhere, so I still like ExFAT for that, generally speaking.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Windows on Btrfs by toastal on Monday April 24, 2023 @10:05PM (#35695746)

Is the performance decent for the ‘cost’ of lacking features?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Windows on Btrfs by hackmiester on Tuesday April 25, 2023 @12:55AM (#35696649)

I would say yes, but I'm not pushing it exceptionally hard. I would say it makes a good default unless/until you run into a problem with it.

[ Parent | on HN ]