News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nuclear Power Is the Answer to Global and Environmental E... by Reason077 on Friday April 21, 2023 @06:29PM (#35661100)
Take the UK as an example. It’s estimated that to decommission our former nuclear sites (built between the 1950s and 1980s) will cost around £260 billion [1] and take 120 years to complete.

This includes the cost of decommissioning closed nuclear plants, disposing of waste, and cleaning up contaminated sites.

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/sep/23/uk-nucle...

Re:Nuclear Power Is the Answer to Global and Environmental E... by evilos on Friday April 21, 2023 @07:10PM (#35661482)
The UK is very much an outlier in the nuclear sector as they went with impossible to refurbish gas cooled reactors. Their experience is unlikely to resemble other countries.

In the US at least, the cost for all decommissioning and fuel handling are built into the cost of electricity sold by law.

Re:Nuclear Power Is the Answer to Global and Environmental E... by Kon5ole on Saturday April 22, 2023 @03:59AM (#35664337)
>In the US at least, the cost for all decommissioning and fuel handling are built into the cost of electricity sold by law.

That was the plan, but it has failed. The mechanism varies but the end result is the same - the operator doesn't pay the actual costs, so they don't charge the actual costs from the customers. The actual costs are paid by taxpayers from some anonymized bucket of money, like a government entity.

As an example, the DOE has so far paid over 100 million USD to SMUD for the decommissioned Rancho Seco plant and will continue to pay for decades more. The operator doesn't pay - the government does.

This has been proven to be true in best-case scenarios like the US, France, Germany and Sweden, and of course once anything deviates from best-case the costs become astronomical almost immediately (Japan).