Re:Nuclear Power Is the Answer to Global and Environmental E...
by haweemwho on Friday April 21, 2023 @04:48PM
(#35659870)
I did address your first remark in the end of my comment:
> All those factors are usually brought up in detail for things like solar and wind plants. It's just disingenuous not to count them for nuclear power.
I did not talk about how much energy is provided or what to do about freight haulers.
Re:Nuclear Power Is the Answer to Global and Environmental E...
by UncleEntity on Friday April 21, 2023 @05:10PM
(#35660229)
I honestly believe that most of the carbon calculations come from the pro-renewable folks to promote whatever pet project they’re on about. Nobody seriously considering building a nuclear power plant is going to care about some “externalities” amortized over its 50-75 year lifetime.
Re:Nuclear Power Is the Answer to Global and Environmental E...
by haweemwho on Friday April 21, 2023 @05:39PM
(#35660578)
> I honestly believe that most of the carbon calculations come from the pro-renewable folks to promote whatever pet project they’re on about.
Sounds like reflection to me, if anything.
How do you think those windmill parts and solar panels get from the manufacturers to the end users?
I personally don’t see solar and wind able to provide enough energy to electrify an entire nation’s fleet of freight haulers. Nuclear, maybe — assuming they build a bunch of little plants so a truck can “refuel” in the middle Wyoming away from large populations.
Maybe Wyoming isn’t the best example as it’s always windy there but the point stands.