Re:Nuclear Power Is the Answer to Global and Environmental E...
by realusername on Friday April 21, 2023 @04:07PM
(#35659299)
It has to be way more than 5 times cheaper to compensate the drop to single digits capacity percentages like last winter.
Re:Nuclear Power Is the Answer to Global and Environmental E...
by timellis-smith on Friday April 21, 2023 @04:09PM
(#35659329)
That doesn't matter because it's not like you can double renewables to increase redundancy (no wind is no wind no matter how many turbines you have)- you need another more expensive energy source as well.
Re:Nuclear Power Is the Answer to Global and Environmental E...
by illiarian on Friday April 21, 2023 @04:48PM
(#35659866)
To cover the drop in generation for the night of April 15, even 400% wind capacity would not be enough.
It was a rather regular, quiet, night in a nation of 80 million people in the middle of Europe. Which means that it was a quiet night across much of Europe.
Re:Nuclear Power Is the Answer to Global and Environmental E...
by quonn on Saturday April 22, 2023 @05:04AM
(#35664629)
As if there would be just one way to compensate this.
- More renewables can be added
- Storage can compensate for this
- Power can be distributed across large areas
- The amount needed at night is not fixed. It only appears fixed because we don‘t care so much. It can be reduced significantly by using devices and processes in a smarter way depending on the availability of power.
It is and it does but being 5x cheaper means even a massive increase in cost still doesnt put it in the same league as nuclear power.