Re:Apple’s fight against iPhone sideloading was pointless at...
by comte7092 on Friday April 21, 2023 @12:45PM
(#35656437)
The thing is, Apple still controls how apps may be sideloaded, and what permissions those apps can use at the OS level. They have no obligation to make sideloading an easy process.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple’s fight against iPhone sideloading was pointless at...
by Gareth321 on Friday April 21, 2023 @01:36PM
(#35657287)
They do, actually. The DMA is one of the most comprehensive and impressive pieces of technology focused legislation in a lifetime. It expressly forbids gatekeepers like Apple from making the process of installing applications any more difficult than it is for Apple's App Store. The purpose of the legislation is to foster fair competition. It's not fair competition if Apple is allowed to make the process prohibitively complex or cumbersome.
Re:Apple’s fight against iPhone sideloading was pointless at...
by lxgr on Friday April 21, 2023 @12:52PM
(#35656565)
I generally agree, but one problem is that many of Apple's rules are enforced primarily or exclusively through policy, not actual technical permissions. This is especially true for all the high-level ones around tracking.
Obviously, things like phone book access can be solved for sideloaded apps just as well as for App Store ones – just like Android has been doing for many years.