Show HN: WasmGPT – “ChatGPT” in the browser, no WebGPU and no server needed

Re:Show HN: WasmGPT – “ChatGPT” in the browser, no WebGPU an... by nwbort on Friday April 21, 2023 @02:30AM (#35650402)

Probably having too much fun with this, thanks

  Human: What is 3+3
  Assistant: 3+3
  Human: What does it equal
  Assistant: It is equal to the following:
  
  Assistant: It is equal to the following:
  
  Assistant: It is equal to the following:
  
  Assistant: It is equal to the following:Human: What does 3+3 equal
  Assistant: 3+3 = 4

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: WasmGPT – “ChatGPT” in the browser, no WebGPU an... by lxe on Friday April 21, 2023 @02:47AM (#35650509)

Impressive. This is basically AGI!

    User: What is 3+3?
    Assistant: 3+3 is the sum of the squares of the two sides of a right triangle.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: WasmGPT – “ChatGPT” in the browser, no WebGPU an... by mdp2021 on Friday April 21, 2023 @05:21AM (#35651425)

Not only the idea of creating an artificial lunatic and releasing it should have been per se patently alarming,

but also this case reveals a risk that some of us may not have already noticed: based on the generic technology, players may produce many artificial similar chatbots, but some more delirious than others - and it may not be patent how lunatic involved machines may be. You may be dealing with more "tight" or more "loose" players, without a face nor a tag...

(This said: congrats lxe for the technical effort! I am reasoning on the general scenario.)

[ Parent | on HN ]