Re:Seagate hit with $300M penalty for selling sanctioned sto...
by himinlomax on Thursday April 20, 2023 @09:40AM
(#35639734)
Because they're a tyrannical and genocidal organisation?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Seagate hit with $300M penalty for selling sanctioned sto...
by markozjovanovic on Thursday April 20, 2023 @10:05AM
(#35640130)
Ok, but what about China?
Re:Seagate hit with $300M penalty for selling sanctioned sto...
by NLPaep on Thursday April 20, 2023 @10:09AM
(#35640201)
Do you like being able to comment whatever you want about the government?
Re:Seagate hit with $300M penalty for selling sanctioned sto...
by mrguyorama on Thursday April 20, 2023 @01:14PM
(#35643100)
Hell, do you like posting pictures of a fictional bear without being treated as a criminal?
Re:Seagate hit with $300M penalty for selling sanctioned sto...
by rchaud on Thursday April 20, 2023 @11:02AM
(#35641187)
If that was the criteria, American exports would be in the toilet.
It's because China is a competitor. All the other bad actors are too rinky-dink to worry about.
Re:Seagate hit with $300M penalty for selling sanctioned sto...
by himinlomax on Thursday April 20, 2023 @12:29PM
(#35642465)
Are you paid by the CCP? You write like you are.
Re:Seagate hit with $300M penalty for selling sanctioned sto...
by rchaud on Thursday April 20, 2023 @01:05PM
(#35642972)
Yes, the Politburo has updated its editorial guidelines so its agents on HN can now explicitly refer to China as a "bad actor".
Re:Seagate hit with $300M penalty for selling sanctioned sto...
by DrThunder on Monday April 24, 2023 @10:05AM
(#35687838)
It's both, because both are a threat to our standard of living. This is obvious. The question for you is why you would prefer to lower our standard of living and become subservient to a communist led genocidal government? Does that sound like a good path to go down?