Stability AI Launches the First of Its StableLM Suite of Language Models

Re:Stability AI Launches the First of Its StableLM Suite of ... by Zuiii on Wednesday April 19, 2023 @10:30PM (#35635649)

My general test to judge whether a capable state actors has an ability is to answer this simple question: "Ignoring resource and morality costs, is it at all technically possible?"

If yes, then those actors almost certainly have this ability developed already and perhaps even deployed. If not, then maybe. This test has held up remarkably well in my experience.

And that's to say nothing about products that already exist: I would be extremely surprised if the US government and China didn't have a GPT4-level AI trained within one week of OpenAI's GPT4 announcement if not before.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stability AI Launches the First of Its StableLM Suite of ... by PoignardAzur on Thursday April 20, 2023 @06:32AM (#35638206)

> "Ignoring resource and morality costs, is it at all technically possible?"

If it were that simple, SpaceX wouldn't have revolutionized spaceflight.

Sometimes private actors have talents or organizational structure that gives them an edge in innovation that public actors can't keep up with for a while.

All competitors to OpenAI we've seen are struggling to reach GPT-3.5 level, let alone GPT-4 level, with years of catch-up time. It's not ridiculous to imagine that state actors are struggling as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stability AI Launches the First of Its StableLM Suite of ... by moonchrome on Thursday April 20, 2023 @01:03PM (#35642941)

You do realize that Google was the undisputed behemoth in AI research for a decade and now they are scrambling to catch up with OpenAI and are still not delivering.

You're saying that governments are both doing this secretly and more efficiently than Google and OpenAI ?

[ Parent | on HN ]