News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI Incident Database by Imnimo on Wednesday April 19, 2023 @02:23PM (#35631535)
It's possible, but the longer description makes it sound like the source of the issue was that the locations were crowd-sourced from a biased sample:

>The game creator Niantic Labs revealed that the Pokemon Go map was derived from a previous augmented reality game, Ingress. Ingress crowdsourced its map from users, who tended to be young, male, white, and English-speaking.

Similarly, from the attached article:

>"It turns out Niantic, which makes Pokémon Go, relied on a map from a previous augmented reality game called Ingress, which was crowd-sourced from its mostly male, tech-savvy players," she wrote in a blog post. "The result is a high concentration of PokéStops in commercial and downtown areas of some cities, while there are typically fewer PokéStops in non-white or residential areas, if there are any at all."

It could be there is some other AI-related problem for Pokemon Go hidden in one of the other articles (they all seem to be about unrelated things - one is about Jynx, one is about the experiences of a black person playing the game, another is speculating the Pokemon Go is a CIA operation...), but the incident report itself doesn't make any allegations of an AI-related issue.

Re:AI Incident Database by to11mtm on Wednesday April 19, 2023 @02:56PM (#35631909)
> It could be there is some other AI-related problem for Pokemon Go hidden in one of the other articles (they all seem to be about unrelated things - one is about Jynx, one is about the experiences of a black person playing the game, another is speculating the Pokemon Go is a CIA operation...)

I'm still not sure if some of those stories were viral marketing or just a bizarre reflection of our zeitgeist in the black mirror.[0]

[0] - Exampled by: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3734361/Woman-tells...

Re:AI Incident Database by n4r9 on Thursday April 20, 2023 @04:54AM (#35637729)
Yeah I went to the report on the website and I agree. It seems like they're using a really broad interpretation of "AI" which includes "anything with augmented reality".