News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No Code, Clean Performance by 32gbsd on Tuesday April 18, 2023 @11:27PM (#35623938)
I see alot of code
Re:No Code, Clean Performance by mlajtos on Wednesday April 19, 2023 @04:12AM (#35625663)
I'll add some graphs and fold the code. Thank you for feedback.
Re:No Code, Clean Performance by znwu on Friday April 21, 2023 @07:52PM (#35661801)
A bit of clickbait. Brief explanation of why that huge perf gap on a well-solved problem:

1. The `memcpy` idea is trivial. I know it's there to serve a different argument. But saying "professional" can't think of `memcpy` is clickbait.

2. Having a bad char table makes a totally different algorithm. A "professional" should at least finish reading their textbook, instead of writing the naive algorithm in Version 3.