Re:Apple’s Agreement with Cupertino Is Taxpayer-Fleecing Col...
by Hamuko on Tuesday April 18, 2023 @12:25PM
(#35616147)
Wasn't Jobs' Mercedes-Benz technically a lease? Because that probably made slightly more financial sense than to outright buy one every 180 days.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple’s Agreement with Cupertino Is Taxpayer-Fleecing Col...
by no_wizard on Tuesday April 18, 2023 @01:54PM
(#35617398)
When I learned about the Jobs' car deal, I asked someone I knew in car sales about it. They said that most likely its a mundane 6 month lease that they were likely just repeatedly auto-renewing against the same vehicle until he chose to drive a different one, if at all.
This is the most probable scenario
Re:Apple’s Agreement with Cupertino Is Taxpayer-Fleecing Col...
by samstave on Tuesday April 18, 2023 @03:16PM
(#35618650)
Cool, so is that deal available to all?
Imagine as a non-billionaire/famous asking for such terms at purchase.
Ffs I was paying cash for a new car and they said they wanted to run my credit.. I said FU and had to threaten to leave if they wanted the sale, why run credit on a cash purchase?
But I don't expect that most dealers will give you a jobs-like deal? Or is this normal?
Re:Apple’s Agreement with Cupertino Is Taxpayer-Fleecing Col...
by QuizzicalCarbon on Tuesday April 18, 2023 @06:05PM
(#35621008)
It’s a short-term car lease. Nothing new.
Re:Apple’s Agreement with Cupertino Is Taxpayer-Fleecing Col...
by samstave on Wednesday April 19, 2023 @12:05PM
(#35629879)
Thanks, I was led to believe all these years that he had some sort of weird loophole he was exploiting... and I always found that weird, like, he had enough money to buy a new car every day if he wanted, so I never understood the impetus.