Re:AT&T Wireless traffic shaping apparently making some webs...
by inportb on Wednesday April 19, 2023 @12:31PM
(#35630189)
That "zero footprint" viewer over Citrix is susprisingly resource-intensive, even at 1080p with lossy compression. If everyone used it (say, if every workstation were a Citrix client), it quickly adds up. During peak hours, it positively chugs. Not sure if networking or compute is the bottleneck here. Perhaps you're right: some institutions have not caught up to this day and age of 4K streaming, and their pre-Netflix infrastructure is buckling under the weight of all these Citrix streams.
Re:AT&T Wireless traffic shaping apparently making some webs...
by riceart on Wednesday April 19, 2023 @09:40PM
(#35635384)
At my current institution the bottleneck is compute - Epic slows to a crawl midday no matter off prem or on. And unfortunately the only constant is academic healthcare IT is a trash fire.
> If everyone used it
Like many large facilities I’ve been in the US, the EMR and PACS viewer (for non rads) are often over Citrix (ie every workstation is a Citrix client). But how many people are simultaneously viewing images - it’s only a minority of users (both in general - the ancillary staff is not) and at any given time (most clinicians are not viewing images at any moment)
This is a large university affiliated center - the bandwidth used by the medical center is a drop in the bucket compared to the size of the pipes they (the uni) have.
Remote Desktop and even PACS are not huge bandwidth consumers in this day and age of 4K streaming. At my large academic institution usually only the radiologists use the PACS client directly on workstations - all the other clinicians are using a “zero footprint” viewer over Citrix like everything else.