News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sold a Story: How Teaching Kids to Read Went So Wrong by michaelcampbell on Monday April 17, 2023 @09:49AM (#35600682)
> it suggests phonics is only effective for a subgroup of pupils

If that subgroup is 90+%, is it worth throwing the baby out with the bathwater? (I don't know the % here, I'm making one up as a thought experiment.)

Re:Sold a Story: How Teaching Kids to Read Went So Wrong by oxfordmale on Monday April 17, 2023 @10:13AM (#35600980)
As the petition calls for, it should be left to the teachers to decide. Even if the succes rate is 90%, are you happy to throw the remaining 10% under the reading bus ?
Re:Sold a Story: How Teaching Kids to Read Went So Wrong by mattmcknight on Monday April 17, 2023 @01:22PM (#35603729)
But so many teachers have been miseducated and they try to leave it out. Wyse and Bradbury at UCL are pushing non-evidence based approaches on the false authority of Margaret Meek Spencer [1] by making up a strawman of teaching only phonics, as if people that advocate teaching phonics claimed that were the only step in learning to read.

[1] https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10152356/1/Wyse_The%20...

Re:Sold a Story: How Teaching Kids to Read Went So Wrong by michaelcampbell on Tuesday April 18, 2023 @12:16PM (#35616007)
I'm not sure why you think this is a one or the other solution.