A man who didn’t invent Flamin’ Hot Cheetos

Re:A man who didn’t invent Flamin’ Hot Cheetos by justrealist on Monday April 17, 2023 @06:41AM (#35598969)

This is sort of interesting, because normally people want GPT to suppress fringe views (ex, the vast body of evidence and literature is pro-vaccine, and they don't want it to promote low-evidence anti-vaccine views). But in this case, the fringe story is, by consensus on HN, the correct one despite the mindshare.

How do you generalize this principle?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A man who didn’t invent Flamin’ Hot Cheetos by bazoom42 on Monday April 17, 2023 @07:47AM (#35599377)

> How do you generalize this principle?

Look at evidence rather than at how many people belive something?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A man who didn’t invent Flamin’ Hot Cheetos by justrealist on Monday April 17, 2023 @08:46AM (#35599860)

People don't do this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A man who didn’t invent Flamin’ Hot Cheetos by paleotrope on Monday April 17, 2023 @09:27AM (#35600330)

Neither does GPT

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A man who didn’t invent Flamin’ Hot Cheetos by ddj231 on Monday April 17, 2023 @09:47AM (#35600646)

I guess the question is whether GPT is supposed to be an emulation of personhood or simply a software tool. Ex. I don’t think we’d want a software tool that lies, steals or cheats despite the fact that people do this

[ Parent | on HN ]