One of the best decisions he made. Antifa accounts calling for violence and terrorism should never have been tolerated on Twitter.

Andy Ngo is a neo-nazi-friendly liar that claims everyone who criticizes him is antifa, and selectively edits his videos to distort the truth.

Twitter threads of Ngo using selective video editing to make it seems like up is down: https://twitter.com/RespectableLaw/status/116496174509978828...

General summary: https://www.salon.com/2019/08/28/right-wing-journalist-andy-...

Ngo lying about leftist critics being violent, and Musk taking him at his word and banning them: https://theintercept.com/2022/11/29/elon-musk-twitter-andy-n...

I get that there’s strong vested interests trying to discredit him. But “selective editing” doesn’t describe the dozens (hundreds?) of videos he filmed when the Federal courthouse in Portland was under siege and he was routinely attacked by the masked terrorists trying to burn down the building.

Does it surprise me that his detractors would claim he is “neo-nazi-friendly”? Not in the slightest. The “anti-fascists” routinely claim the people they brutalize are fascist nazis - it’s a form of projection / deflection.

Your argument is to gloss over his doctored videos in favor of the ones you think aren't?

Oh well, if being neo-nazi-friendly is OK, will you still defend him hanging out with pedophiles?

Here's pics of Ngo hanging out with Amos Yew, a year after Yew's tweets (also in pic) that children should be able to have sex, and that child porn should be legal: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FidcvHsX0AI1ncI?format=jpg&name=...

Feel free to admit that Ngo is a colossal liar and a horrible person any time now.