News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Red Hat model only worked for Red Hat by ilyt on Sunday April 16, 2023 @06:21AM (#35588731)
Long term support and ability to have someone on the line when it breaks.

Not everyone (probably not many too) have experts that will track a kernel bug or know how some obscure interaction works.

If you have knowledgable people in-house the RHEL is essentially useless and WILL actively make your life harder compared to just installing Ubuntu or plain Debian as they like to mess up and segment software that normally would be in same repo... but if you don't, and "just need a software that happens to run on Linux", it's cheaper to pay for few servers than hire top level Linux expert.

When we used it many of the "wait, this doesn't work like in vanilla Linux" could be traced to some RHEL engineer changing stuff to work for their enterprise customers.

Like we had audit fail on too old SSH encryption modes enabled. The encryption modes that were disabled and deprecated in that version of SSH but Redhat brought it back with a patch, presumably to support some legacy environments of their customers.

They also do some utter mess with openssl, like removing a bunch of EC curves and various FIPS-related stuff of dubious security impact, re-adding sha1 support and bunch of other stuff

http://mirror.stream.centos.org/9-stream/BaseOS/source/tree/...

There are no comments on this comment yet.