News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why the Rust Trademark Policy was such a problem by chungy on Saturday April 15, 2023 @03:18PM (#35583707)
What's wrong with it is that it's nothing the Rust Foundation should ever be concerned with.

I sure as hell wouldn't want to attend conferences where firearms are forbidden. I don't want to be an easy target.

Re:Why the Rust Trademark Policy was such a problem by krapp on Saturday April 15, 2023 @03:20PM (#35583726)
An easy target for whom? If you show up to a conference armed because you're paranoid about being a "target," you are a bigger danger than whatever hypothetical threat you feel you need a loaded gun on hand at all times for.
Re:Why the Rust Trademark Policy was such a problem by chungy on Saturday April 15, 2023 @04:24PM (#35584198)
An easy target for whomever decides to start shooting. Murderers don't obey rules, that's part of being a murderer.

The idea that carrying a firearm is inherently dangerous is absurd.

Re:Why the Rust Trademark Policy was such a problem by Vecr on Sunday April 16, 2023 @01:12AM (#35587460)
Why do you think that? For best results you would want at least two people who don't know each other, but are both well trained, carrying. Reduces the chance that something could happen unopposed.
Re:Why the Rust Trademark Policy was such a problem by tourmalinetaco on Sunday April 16, 2023 @05:34PM (#35594482)
> you are a bigger danger Yes, the legally carrying gun owner with said gun stowed away is scarier than some madman with a gun and the intent to kill you. How could I forget?