Re:The Electron Is So Round That It’s Ruling Out Potential N...
by brookst on Saturday April 15, 2023 @12:10PM
(#35581936)
Whatever happened to Skrillex?
Re:The Electron Is So Round That It’s Ruling Out Potential N...
by kortex on Saturday April 15, 2023 @03:54PM
(#35583985)
Thank you, this is why I love HN!
Ah, that makes sense! I thought neutrons were hard to store because they were neutral and go right through things, but I guess cold neutrons can be stored (at least until they decay into protons).
Is it expected that pEDM ~= nEDM, since they are uud and udd?
Re:The Electron Is So Round That It’s Ruling Out Potential N...
by vihren on Sunday April 16, 2023 @02:02AM
(#35587664)
I cannot find the citation right now, but the p and n EDMs are expected to be close to each other ~1e-32 e.cm. One part is that they are uud and udd and the other thing to consider is that the quarks make up only ~2% of the proton/neutron mass. Most is binding energy and a soup of virtual quarks and gluons and in that regard they are even more similar I think. I am not very familiar how theoreticians calculate the EDM of such complex particles though.
On a side note, 'ultra cold neutrons' are a super interesting type of matter. Their energy is so low that they can be stored in bottles and are transported through tubes using turbines and mechanical valves.
The usual quote is that for the proton we can reach sensitivities up to 10^-29 (around three orders of magnitude lower than the current nEDM limit), but thats only the statistical sensitivity. The systematic effects that would spoil that come much earlier and this limit is close to science fiction at this point. For example, if you have a magnetic field in the order of attotesla in the region of the storage ring it will dominate the measurement.
Would be happy to answer more edm questions :)