Re:91% of ML Models Degrade over Time
by hammyhavoc on Friday April 14, 2023 @06:40AM
(#35567859)
I'm concerned that quality of code is going to degrade further as a result of people leaning heavily on these technologies, despite any future improvement, it isn't the same as a human being giving something thought.
We're going to discover that a lot of code doesn't take much thought.
Re:91% of ML Models Degrade over Time
by hammyhavoc on Friday April 14, 2023 @08:48AM
(#35568958)
The performance of Microsoft Teams suggests otherwise.
Re:91% of ML Models Degrade over Time
by marcosdumay on Friday April 14, 2023 @10:59AM
(#35570270)
If you are ok with a lot of code, that doesn't take much thought.
LLM might occasional fill certain gaps (like one programming subculture being completely ignorant about a certain approach that is well established in another), but from its perspective, a transfer like that would be more a failure to hit the target style than an achievement. It's like learning scala from stackoverflow vs learning php from stackoverflow: one leads you deep into monad fundamentalism, the other into "how can this be bad if it works???"