Your question specifically distracts from the IAB, which is one of the most toxic self-interested anti-humanity pieces of garbage on the planet. We should talk about them more. Or figure out how to end them. By far one of the most malignant cancers on this planet with absolutely no respect, not trying at all to balance concerns, 100% self interested in unabated Panopticon survelliance.
In general I think letting ourselves be put off by shallow things is a defect we should strive to avoid. The language here is fairly due & true. If you don't want to handle it, fine. Be my guest. I'll feel otherwise later & want to find ways to do better, but I also think & will think it's up to you to decide whether to be interested, and letting little shit get in the way of the message just shouldnt be an issue for most folks; some mature handling of rawer issues is just part of our expected development.
Overall there's only a few things that really toe a line here. Do you disagree? How so?
Your ask about Moz/Safari I've said quite a few words on elsewhere in this post & on others. I think the far more interesting topic is what a bunch of jackal villains the IAB is. I cannot stress enough how hard a time Google has had trying to preserve any privacy on the net when there is a huge lobbyist group close to regulators pushing so hard to end user privacy. These people have the worst most anti-user outlook imaginable, are up to absolutely no good. My strong language is a just a start on describing how awful the IAB is & what sinister monsters Google has to go to the mat & wrestle to try to preserve user privacy in a post 3rd party cookie world.
Personally I don't think it's right that I get flagged for my previous reply, but I'm glad to have made a better go at my reply this time. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35565707