These old-fashioned things https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven-segment_display , you know?
One could possibly overengineer it by showing the chosen temperature in red, and the actual temperature in blue, or something.
From personal experience this is unnecessary, as evidenced by water boiling at 100°C, starting to have a few small bubbles/sparkles at 90°C, and none of that at 80°C.
Very few people cook with temperature as part of the process (stove top, anyway).
But nerd that I am, one of the first things I tried was that bubble check until boiling, and how exact the display is. Since that time I'm considering any other method obsolete. Power in Watts? Useless. Some arbitrarily chosen steps? Useless. Temperature, sight and smell it is!
Step 1: believe that the controls are consistent and reasonably accurate Step 2: learn what control setting corresponds to what level of heat
The biggest problem with this method is that it can take a while (for me, perhaps on the order of a year or two). At this point, with my current gas range, I don't need to look at the flame - I know that half-way between "medium" and "medium-low" is just what I need for the current cooking task.
No guessing. No experience required. Just measured. Done.