Re:Animal Sex Determination Is Weirder Than You Think
by circlefavshape on Thursday April 13, 2023 @10:29AM
(#35556023)
I think you're straw-manning the "common sense" view. "Unable to get pregnant" is actually not a common definition of "male", afaics
Re:Animal Sex Determination Is Weirder Than You Think
by ben_w on Thursday April 13, 2023 @12:43PM
(#35558259)
At worse, nut-picking rather than straw-manning. This specific (bad) definition comes up a lot, though it's certainly possible I've mistaken frequency of observation for frequency of beliefs.
I didn't say it was a good definition :)
In fact, the very point you're making here is also commonly brought up whenever someone uses this common definition to try to argue against trans issues, which is how I know it's commonly used.
I rather hopped that me saying "birds would be all be male" would be a hint that I didn't hold this definition in high regard.
> whether something is a fruit or vegetable?
Tom-ah-to, to-may-to, but either way I really need to figure out how to use it in a fruit salad.
Sure, almost everyone has had such an argument; but I've noticed many tend to say "it's common sense" and stop listening from then on.