Re:GPT4 gets a 0 on Steven Landsbrug's undergrad econ exam
by SilverBirch on Thursday April 13, 2023 @04:17AM
(#35552484)
I think you're just reading an ambiguous sentence in a way that obviously wouldn't make sense in context. The question is in a very familiar form: describe a scenario with some assumptions, describe a peturbation, ask what impact the peturbation has. If the context was some annoying internet quiz, the answer might have been a gotcha that the number of people in the queue stay the same.... but this is an econ question it's going to involve how people respond to economic incentives.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GPT4 gets a 0 on Steven Landsbrug's undergrad econ exam
by hgsgm on Thursday April 13, 2023 @09:16AM
(#35554953)
This is like those LeetCode questions in job interviews, or the interviewer wants a complicated O(n) solution when the problem as stated would be better solved with a simple O(n^2) solution because the maximum problem size is tiny.
It's a mind-reading game of which assumptions the professor/interviewer wants to keep solid which ones are open to change.