Seems like lazy journalism to me.. are we saying in 2023 that there were jobs that obviously could've been outsourced but were overlooked? I have to say that anything not outsourced by now is either too granular or niche to be put into a professional-services contract, or is a job in which having the Varsity or JV team is needed and/or the best value proposition. We may see a rethink of that value-prop/cost equation - but articles and pitches that equate having tools/infra to accommodate offshoring as being the key driver to whether to offshore a role or delivery are being entirely too simplistic.