News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why don't we define “imaginary” numbers for every “imposs... by red_trumpet on Wednesday April 12, 2023 @09:21AM (#35539203)
You mean like $x^{-1} = 1/x$? That's called a rational function[1], but not a polynomial, so it's not an element of the polynomial ring[2]. Of course you can also consider the algebra of rational functions, but this is a field[3] (almost by definition: you make every polynomial invertible), which means that modding out anything other than 0 yields the zero ring[4].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_function

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polynomial_ring

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_(mathematics)

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_ring

There are no comments on this comment yet.