And yet there must be hundreds of thousands of hours of human creation which will, without preservation, be utterly destroyed. There's definitely something tragic there.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is the wretched work of copyright. This is the still-unfulfilled promise of the information age. Let's not forget that.
I would pay for 'series and movies' nobody wants to see and so would many others, so if not only for posterity, then do it for some profit. I wouldn't sign up for some modern subscription, but if these were included I would. It's just a matter of being complete.
But yes, you are right, the copyright issue sucks; no-one cares about these series/movies, so why not remove the (c).
People upload content for which they don't own the copyright all the time.
In this case, the people with the videos just don't want to go through the effort of digitizing and uploading. Even if the studios said, "All of our old stuff is public domain," it wouldn't change anything.
On a slightly related topic; HN (and Reddit) is FULL with domain experts; where are the people who work at these studios and television makers? Do they actually ever come here? Why don't they chime in ever? I would love to have a discussion with people working in the industry. They seem to be so focused on money that they don't want to hear reason, so I would definitely like to know if all management thinks like that for instance.
And slightly related to that last part:
In the Netherlands we have this idiot who is the ceo of Brein which is the Dutch anti piracy organisation; he sometimes does some comments or interviews, but he just quits after he is torpedoed down as the guy knows nothing. (And probably cannot do anything either tbh.) But one of the things he can never answer is; 'people will pay for anything, if you make it easy; as long as BitTorrent is 100x faster/easier than going the legal route, people will download illegally'. Must be industry people who have some ideas about that.
I imagine in many cases the cost (and opportunity cost) of just thinking about it isn't worth what studios and other holders believe they'll make from the effort.
This makes me really, really sad. Although I would likely find it juvenile and not as good as I remembered it, it was one of the best things on TV growing up and I'd love to share it with my future kids. Flour-bomb fight!
Edit: So it's listed on the AFSA website... does this mean the masters are still in the archive?
Brendon Chase (UK, 80s) is another one.
And there was a series in the 80s I remember as being called 'Saturday' (UK I think, about children growing up in some village and (very young) puppy love, very innocent series which I liked so much I quit my swimming lessons for it as it was on the same night and we didn't have a VCR; it was aroudn the same time as the Tripods on TV me thinks) which, due to the title, I never found anything about :( I would love to find that back as well. Hmmm. Must... Go... To... TV... Forums...
What does it matter to THEM to just have some students digitize EVERYTHING and put it online for free or a small fee? I imagine there are 100s of 1000s of these series and movies around the world going to waste. No matter if popular or not, what DOES IT MATTER to put them online, it's not as if it's expensive to do so esp if you charge some monthly or one-off fee to watch them.