News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GPT-4 Outperforms Elite Crowdworkers, Saving Researchers $500k and 20k hours. Parent comment

Re:GPT-4 Outperforms Elite Crowdworkers, Saving Researchers ... by mclightning on Wednesday April 12, 2023 @04:15AM (#35536459)
This is a bigger problem than people realise.

Think about it, how many millions of articles are posted online produced by OpenAI's GPTs to date... Good luck clearing out the training data for GPT-5.

True human content will get gradually scarce. We steer it for sure for our posts, but it is still GPTs that do the heavy lifting.

OpenAI's own classifier fails to detect GPT-4 generated text at the moment.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 Outperforms Elite Crowdworkers, Saving Researchers ... by pixl97 on Wednesday April 12, 2023 @03:19PM (#35545244)
>classifier fails to detect GPT-4 generated text

That's because beyond the 'As an AI language model' and a few key words it can be nearly impossible to detect GPT-4 especially if any prompt is used to intentionally keep it from being detected.

Human like text is a solved problem. There is no more getting better at detecting AI written text, there is only classifying more humans incorrectly at this point.

[ Parent | on HN ]