I had a team of coders and optimisers working for me whose salaries topped off at 150 all in, 200 for the one who could turn out assembly that ran in milliseconds.
I always saw my job as being finding in-efficiencies and irrationalities; they saw it as coding. I happened to code (and not all that brilliantly, hence the support). But the argument that pure developers should be compensated richly doesn't gel with the argument that programming is the new literacy.
I'm trying to find an analogous system which could help us figure out what would have happened to developer salaries in SV given what tech companies pay in NYC.
The basic financial literacy these guys are desired to have is higher than naught. Further, there are different technologies, paradigms, and cultures involved (though at a hedge fund the last part converges).
A test for this would be tech dev salaries in NYC versus SV.
Hedge funds regularly give $250K or more for an engineer with experience.
do you mean software engineers? That would surprise me.
HEdge funds routinely pay $200+. With a fair market I think we should have seen similar numbers here in the valley.
There are many times more engineers in New York than in SV.