News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I worked at Google for -10 days by yellowapple on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @06:21PM (#35532421)
> I still don't understand how this isn't considered fraud

Because there are 168 hours in a week and each full-time job only consumes 40 of them.

Now, if the employers are competitors of one another, or there's otherwise something that would produce a conflict of interest, then that's another story - but beyond that? As long as you're fulfilling your duties for both jobs, it's neither employers' business what you do on your "free time".

Re:I worked at Google for -10 days by jrochkind1 on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @07:07PM (#35532931)
You really think people doing this are working 80 hours a week, 40 on each job?

That seems unlikely to me, but maybe not to you? Or you're saying it's like plausible deniability, like nobody can prove they weren't, or something?

I wonder if GP who mentioned giving his two weeks notice on first day of new job... was planning on working 80 hour weeks for two weeks while they overlapped?

Re:I worked at Google for -10 days by yellowapple on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @08:22PM (#35533532)
> That seems unlikely to me, but maybe not to you? Or you're saying it's like plausible deniability, like nobody can prove they weren't, or something?

I mean, there were times in my career where I was working 12+ hour days for one employer, so working 16+ hour days for two doesn't seem like that much of a stretch; still leaves you with 8 hours of sleep. I've known enough workaholics in my time to know that it ain't beyond the realm of possibility.

But yes, it's more of a plausible deniability thing. Either/both employers would need to prove that you weren't working 40 hours a week for them, which is not only impossible (good luck proving a negative) but a much higher standard than is reasonable in the first place (especially for programmers, having a full 40 productive hours a week is rare and unsustainable; half that or less is more typical).