News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Beauty of Pulse Arc Welding by kube-system on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @01:59PM (#35528735)
There are FDM processes that go back down in Z direction - like printing multiple units on the same build plate one at a time. And in those situations you do have to be careful not to crash the print head into an already printed part.
Re:The Beauty of Pulse Arc Welding by dale_glass on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @02:58PM (#35529727)
Most will print every copy at once, switching between them.

It also often works better because doing small parts can overheat the plastic. Moving between copies lets things cool down.

Re:The Beauty of Pulse Arc Welding by kube-system on Wednesday April 12, 2023 @01:33PM (#35543504)
It can be useful for circumstances where you want to minimize (or even eliminate) retraction. I've done some cool prints in vase/spiralize mode with large nozzle sizes -- with zero seams, zero retractions, and zero moves over printed surfaces, you can get some really awesome looking prints.

But anyway it was just an example of a scenario where the slicer might not have enough information to know how to not crash the print head.

Re:The Beauty of Pulse Arc Welding by Kirby64 on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @04:21PM (#35530984)
Almost noone does this, though. But, even then, you have all the information you need in theory because you're putting down the plastic.
Re:The Beauty of Pulse Arc Welding by kube-system on Wednesday April 12, 2023 @01:25PM (#35543363)
FDM slicers usually don't have the information about the dimensions of the print head. Yes, it is a rarely used feature that is only supported by some slicers, but I just mention it as an illustration of the similar issue that exists with CNC machining.