Re:The EU proposed CRA law may have unintended consequence f...
by bcrosby95 on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @01:33PM
(#35528350)
> If a company sells a product that uses Linux, they will be liable regardless of whether they contributed to Linux development or not. If part of the product was itself purchased from a third party, the third party will be liable for that part. But open-source developers who don’t monetize the software won’t be liable.
It sounds like a good reason to pay for support rather than just using free versions.
Not paying and hacked because of a vulnerability in the Linux kernel? You're liable. Paying and hacked because of a vulnerability in the Linux kernel? They're liable.
One case that could potentially become problematic is OSS developers who have Patreon subscribers or similar, where those subscribers could conceivably pass on liability claims.