Re:Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
by ImHereToVote on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @02:40AM
(#35521636)
General intelligence doesn't necessarily mean human like intelligence.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
by isaacfrond on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @03:52AM
(#35522147)
You are right that there are intelligences possible that are not human. Then again, if one is sufficiently intelligent, one could probably convincingly simulate human intelligence. There are chess training programs for example that are specifically trained to play human moves, rather than the best moves.
Re:Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
by johnthewise on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @04:39AM
(#35522461)
When prompted, chatgpt answers you as if it is a pirate.
Re:Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
by leroy-is-here on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @07:53AM
(#35523799)
What other general intelligence have we seen other than human? We know, of course, that animals have intelligence, but they do not appear to talk. How are we measuring general intelligence now? By IQ, a human test through words and symbols.
Re:Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
by naasking on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @09:28AM
(#35524841)
The g-factor of IQ may or may not have anything to do with general intelligence. The general intelligence of AGI is probably a broader category than the g-factor.
Re:Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
by leroy-is-here on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @01:16PM
(#35528117)
When I made my comment, I knew nothing about a “g-factor”.
Re:Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
by boringuser2 on Wednesday April 12, 2023 @09:06AM
(#35539013)
Intelligence is a tool of the human self, not the self.