Re:Nobel Prize winner: The universe keeps dying and being re...
by est31 on Monday April 10, 2023 @12:42PM
(#35514269)
Yes, this suggestion is practically impossible to prove (or disprove), and quite fringe, but the listed examples in that article are usually of things people suggested outside of their field after they got the Nobel prize, and often things that were quite easily disproved at the time of suggestion. Meanwhile Penrose suggested CCC (2006) way before he received the Nobel prize (2020). Also, cosmology is Penrose's research area.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nobel Prize winner: The universe keeps dying and being re...
by 2022-11-07 on Monday April 10, 2023 @12:58PM
(#35514438)
A lot of our well-evidenced scientific ideas today would've been practically impossible to prove at some point in history. I think people forget that all hypotheses are nothing more than thoughtful just-so stories when they're first stated.
Re:Nobel Prize winner: The universe keeps dying and being re...
by markhahn on Monday April 10, 2023 @12:57PM
(#35514432)
what happened before this universe is not cosmology, but religion, and that's not Penrose's field. neither is neuroscience, where he's giving air to similarly unsupported ideas.
Re:Nobel Prize winner: The universe keeps dying and being re...
by RhodesianHunter on Monday April 10, 2023 @01:15PM
(#35514645)
>what happened before this universe is not cosmology, but religion
Absolute nonsense