News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why don't we define “imaginary” numbers for every “imposs... by hansvm on Monday April 10, 2023 @10:40AM (#35512893)
Take a look into division rings as a concept. The usual definition for division in rings and fields is via multiplicative inverses for some subset of the nonzero elements. Not all algebraic spaces have division, but that doesn't change what it is, especially from the "number theory, fields, and rings" point of view.

Unless you're talking about some higher-order concept?

There are no comments on this comment yet.