News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why don't we define “imaginary” numbers for every “impossibility”? (2012). Parent comment

Re:Why don't we define “imaginary” numbers for every “imposs... by poizan42 on Monday April 10, 2023 @09:49AM (#35512255)
It's not making a multiplicative inverse of 0 exist though, it just defines a '/' operator that is slightly different from our usual one (i.e. a/b = a*b^(-1))
[ Parent | on HN ]

There are no comments on this comment yet.