And bill Maher interacts with other intellectuals. It doesn’t make things incorrect. I never said Huberman doesn’t usually interact with other researchers. I didn’t say most were right wing. I don’t know most of them.

Also how about any other part of my post? Besides doing what someone else did and bringing up how I’m a bully or conceited while being far more dismissive than myself.

You have a short memory. If you glance up, this is what you wrote:

> Huberman usually does not interact with people who don't at least lean right.

> I didn’t say most were right wing.

You contradict yourself. Pick one.

> Besides doing what someone else did and bringing up how I’m a bully or conceited while being far more dismissive than myself.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conceit

Leaning right is not the same as right wing. Based on the word “lean”. If someone believes in capitalism as a positive concept then they lean right based on the meaning of what right politics are.

That’s confusing. Let me use another word: Huberman and Joe Rogan are liberals. So are a lot of the researchers and other people he brings on. If we agree then we are discussing semantics. Any conceit was a misunderstanding of me using words that you disagree with because of your world perspective vs mine.