Re:Why don't we define “imaginary” numbers for every “imposs...
by civilized on Monday April 10, 2023 @08:27AM
(#35511476)
Thanks for this comment! Quick note - for clarity and conformity with standard notation, it would be good to have parentheses around the denominators of those ring quotients (in those cases like x^2 - 1 where they contain multiple additive terms).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why don't we define “imaginary” numbers for every “imposs...
by heinrichhartman on Monday April 10, 2023 @09:34AM
(#35512071)
fixed.