Re:The LLama Effect: Leak Sparked a Series of Open Source Al...
by riceart on Sunday April 09, 2023 @02:21PM
(#35505108)
Before the inevitable idiots come in to say hurr durr but have you tried ChatGPT 4… yes I paid for it, and it is just as prone to hallucinations of factual information. It loves to make up new names for peoples initials.
Re:The LLama Effect: Leak Sparked a Series of Open Source Al...
by vidarh on Sunday April 09, 2023 @03:00PM
(#35505432)
While it is still prone to hallucinations, with GPT4 I've had it tell me "X is not a real project, but assuming it exists and is designed to do Y [based on the name], I can provide you with a general guide on how to use it." I never had earlier version to do that. So it does appear to be better, though it's certainly still an issue.
Re:The LLama Effect: Leak Sparked a Series of Open Source Al...
by dumbaccount123 on Sunday April 09, 2023 @03:20PM
(#35505583)
I found the opposite to be true, i mean sure if youre tricking it. Wait for GPT 5-6 in a year or two and see haha.
Re:The LLama Effect: Leak Sparked a Series of Open Source Al...
by dumbaccount123 on Sunday April 09, 2023 @03:37PM
(#35505722)
Also please refrain from calling other members idiots, next time you wont be warned.
Most recently I've been interested in what's happened with the 4-color theorem since the 1976 computer-assisted proof, and decided to use GPTChat instead of google+wikipedia. GPTChat had me convinced and excited that, apparently the computer-assisted part of the proof has been getting steadily smaller and smaller over the years and decades, and we're getting close to a proof that might not need computer assistance at all. It wrote really convincingly about it! And then I went and looked for the papers it had talked about. They didn't exist, and their authors either didn't exist, or worked in completely unrelated fields.