Haven’t we pretty much figured out these things are doing more than just predicting the next token at this point?
There’s probably a lot to be done with a “prediction machine”, birds aren’t all that smart but can catch bugs in midair.
It’s actually a good question: what will next-token prediction be able to do on new datasets? The error is thinking you can answer it, even in broad terms.
For example, I expect skill at writing some kinds of code to improve dramatically because running tests in a sandbox looks easy. It’s already being researched. [1] Extending that to device drivers might be a bit harder. Fuzzing is already mostly automated and smarter fuzzing could get pretty scary.
[1] https://nanothoughts.substack.com/p/reflecting-on-reflexion
If you follow the link I shared, some researchers automated asking GPT4 to write tests, running the tests in a sandbox, and feeding the results back in.
With access to python interpreter I don't see any issue
Transformers are Sample-Efficient World Models:
https://github.com/eloialonso/iris#transformers-are-sample-e...
There is still plenty of improvement ahead but I don’t think anything genuinely surprising will come from the current regime of feedforward models. What is missing is action — an interactive feedback loop between agent and environment. Progress in RL and robotics has been very slow by comparison and unless we see a breakthrough there, I would guess the GPT phase plateaus in the next 5-10 years.