I mean the same argument could be made re: the publishers as gatekeepers. (And it's why I'm generally a proponent of self-publishing even if the quality control isn't there).

For example, I can't see one of the big publishers happily publishing a treatise on how they're killing innovation. One of the little ones, certainly. (Beacon probably would).

> But do we want only the voices of those with trust funds to be heard?

Do we want only the voices of those who can present their work in a palatable money making way to data analysts and C-suite types to be heard?