I wish GPT4 had never happened

Re:I wish GPT4 had never happened by cryptoegorophy on Saturday April 08, 2023 @11:00AM (#35493831)

There is cutting costs and scaling. You need 9 other people for scaling. Imaging if you with GPT4 can replace 10 people with 1. What if you keep other 9 and train them to prompt on GPT? Now you have not 10 people working but 100 and a cost of 10.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I wish GPT4 had never happened by hiq on Saturday April 08, 2023 @04:55PM (#35497535)

I guess the follow-up question is: if you do value these 100 units of work (1 employee == 1 unit pre-GPT), why did you only have 10 workers at the beginning? Doesn't it mean that 10 units of work is what you thought was optimal? What are you going to do with 100?

Or maybe you're implying that reducing the costs changes this equation?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I wish GPT4 had never happened by tekknik on Sunday April 09, 2023 @03:07AM (#35500625)

It also implies the market can handle, and needs, the scaling. In some industries, like say food services, the problem isn’t lack of people.

[ Parent | on HN ]