The company behind Stable Diffusion appears to be at risk of going under

Re:The company behind Stable Diffusion appears to be at risk... by rtpg on Friday April 07, 2023 @10:36PM (#35489943)

I think there's a lot of "open core" stuff like Sentry, Tailscale (I think?), or Gitlab. Where "enough" of the house is given away in theory for you to do it yourself (but why would you do that?)

Metabase is another company I knew where they do this, but I don't know how successful they are (their hosting costs start at "way too high considering how easy the thing is to spin up", which was great for me at $PREV_JOB I suppose but)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The company behind Stable Diffusion appears to be at risk... by beckingz on Friday April 07, 2023 @10:48PM (#35490010)

I'm concerned about Metabase because of this. Amazing project, but the cloud offering doesn't seem to be enough.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The company behind Stable Diffusion appears to be at risk... by hakfoo on Saturday April 08, 2023 @03:03AM (#35491213)

Perhaps the business case is for "we want the Open Source product, but we're in a compliance-oriented business and need to have someone selling us a support and maintenance contract behind it."

I'd suspect the moment you touch anything with external auditing, it looks better to say "we've got a fully paid up support contract from the vendor" than "we're running v1.23.456-ubuntu-patch-357-with-chives-and-salsa that we downloaded last week."

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The company behind Stable Diffusion appears to be at risk... by ralph84 on Saturday April 08, 2023 @04:09AM (#35491526)

> Sentry, Tailscale, or Gitlab

None of which are profitable

[ Parent | on HN ]