Re:Court Ruling Could Affect the Future Direction of DAOs
by rtkwe on Thursday April 06, 2023 @11:41AM
(#35469941)
What does that even mean for a DAO to be out of state? Is it based on people with voting power in the DAO?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Court Ruling Could Affect the Future Direction of DAOs
by houston_Euler on Thursday April 06, 2023 @12:25PM
(#35470687)
IANAL, but I believe it means that the company can't be headquartered somewhere else.
Re:Court Ruling Could Affect the Future Direction of DAOs
by rtkwe on Monday April 10, 2023 @03:33PM
(#35516390)
In terms of a pure DAO though that's a weirdly nebulous distinction. Before incorporation they're nowhere legally speaking, there's not a single physical location it's operating out of.
Maybe like others have said it's mostly about otherwise extant orgs not being able to register.
Re:Court Ruling Could Affect the Future Direction of DAOs
by JumpCrisscross on Thursday April 06, 2023 @12:50PM
(#35471070)
> What does that even mean for a DAO to be out of state?
A Delaware corporation doing business in California must file as a foreign corporation in the latter. It sounds like Wyoming is saying a DAO can't incorporate out of state and take advantage of the Wyoming DAO LLC, but this doesn't appear to have been fleshed out.
Re:Court Ruling Could Affect the Future Direction of DAOs
by WorldMaker on Thursday April 06, 2023 @02:19PM
(#35472275)
I think the more interesting question is what does it mean for a DAO to be considered in state to qualify for this type of LLC? Do they need to keep at least a PO Box as presence in the state? Some amount of real estate? Some number of state-resident members with voting power? Do the other usual LLC requirements apply?