Re:DevOps uses a capability model, not a maturity model
by mattcwilson on Thursday April 06, 2023 @08:10AM
(#35467247)
Almost as though there should be a “Capability Maturity Model.” Man, I wish someone had come up with that 40 years ago.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:DevOps uses a capability model, not a maturity model
by altgeek on Thursday April 06, 2023 @08:43AM
(#35467581)
For a cynical (and, perhaps bitter?) laugh, how about working at an org that has a <= 0 score?
Re:DevOps uses a capability model, not a maturity model
by hestefisk on Thursday April 06, 2023 @08:41AM
(#35467575)
Exactly my thoughts. I worked in a company that was CMMI 5 certified. It was a bureaucracy.
Re:DevOps uses a capability model, not a maturity model
by docandrew on Thursday April 06, 2023 @08:35AM
(#35467514)
My only exposure was CMMI. Your comment gave me flashbacks. It made a lot of consultants a lot of money, that’s for sure. It was also a good way for federal acquisitions officials to steer contracts to preferred vendors, few of whom were able to deliver quality products on time.
Re:DevOps uses a capability model, not a maturity model
by brookritz on Thursday April 06, 2023 @06:05PM
(#35475180)
./configure;make;make install ?
Re:DevOps uses a capability model, not a maturity model
by quickthrower2 on Thursday April 06, 2023 @08:17AM
(#35467317)
I looked up CMM bit it seems different to what is described in the article by Octopus and sounds more like just a maturity model.