Re:$60/MWh for advanced nuclear electricity is achievable: G...
by robertlagrant on Friday April 07, 2023 @04:27PM
(#35486559)
> Always so concerned" about whatever imaginary downside alternatives have
It's not a downside. It's a problem with the study.
> completely credulous about nuclear which has failed over and over again
Can you cite where I've done this?
> You're claiming without any evidence whatsoever that at least 99% of geographically appropriate sites are unusable.
And where I've done this?
There it is. Always so concerned" about whatever imaginary downside alternatives have, but completely credulous about nuclear which has failed over and over again.
You're claiming without any evidence whatsoever that at least 99% of geographically appropriate sites are unusable.