News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on iAPX432: Gordon Moore, Risk and Intel’s Super-CISC Failure. Parent comment

Re:iAPX432: Gordon Moore, Risk and Intel’s Super-CISC Failure by lproven on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @01:40PM (#35443285)
Aha, ISWYM now.

I can't. I just remember noticing it a few years back, and being surprised, and then checking occasionally and it stayed there for a while.

Why not contact them and ask, if you're curious? If I'm wrong, you'll have the pleasure of refuting me. ;-)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:iAPX432: Gordon Moore, Risk and Intel’s Super-CISC Failure by igouy on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @12:39PM (#35456889)
> Compared to C++, Ada is a tiny lean fast sportscar of a language.

We can see C++ program measurements faster than Ada program measurements in those archived "programming language benchmarks game" charts.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:iAPX432: Gordon Moore, Risk and Intel’s Super-CISC Failure by lproven on Thursday April 06, 2023 @04:20AM (#35465716)
What I was getting at was the size of the language, not its compiled speed.

Does any single human understand all of C++ and use it all? Is it even possible any more? If they did, could anyone else read the code?

[ Parent | on HN ]