Right up until you account for interference.
>which is why starlink could in theory achieve better latency than a straight run of fiber optic across the world [2].
Emphasis on "in theory". Back here in reality, Starlink's maximum speeds are measured in hundreds of megabits per second, whereas fiber optic cables are already stretching into hundreds of gigabits per second, literally several orders of magnitude more bandwidth (plus a couple of orders of magnitude less latency, for good measure), due to the inherent superiority of wired over wireless in avoiding interference.
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/11/priva...
could you provide more info? the source I gave you has a real-world example of a wireless link used over fiber to achieve better latency.
it actually travels faster through air (no vacuum necessary) than through fiber or copper as those transmit information at 2/3rd of the speed of light while air transmits it at 99% [1].
which is why starlink could in theory achieve better latency than a straight run of fiber optic across the world [2].
this of course doesn't mean that it's better in a mouse because of the overhead of processing such a short distance.
[1] https://archive.is/c859M [2] https://youtu.be/QEIUdMiColU?t=238